<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" >
	<channel>
		<title>Rankpanel Blog &#187; | Rankpanel Blog</title>
		<atom:link href="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog</link>
		<description>Crunching large scale search data</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 10:16:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<language>en</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
			<title>Meet the all new, better, and higher quality Rankpanel</title>
			<link>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/meet-the-all-new-better-and-higher-quality-rankpanel/</link>
			<comments>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/meet-the-all-new-better-and-higher-quality-rankpanel/#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Alexander Puschilov</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/?p=1145</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" height="170" src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/chinese.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Rankpanel-Sun-Tsu-Help-Master" title="Rankpanel-Sun-Tsu-Help-Master" /></p><p>After redesigning the content pages, as well as adding a Feedback form (<strong>please tell us how can we improve Rankpanel or how much you like the changes!</strong>) we're finally setting our sight on the app. Today we're releasing new tables, a new help section, and laying the groundwork for something very special.</p><h2>Error Background</h2><p>First, though, let me provide a little background on why we had these problems in the beginning of this week. Last week we changed our data holding period to 3 years in order to provide you with more historic data as we grow older. Because we're using quite new technologies that are not yet stable and tested in all instances, some things happened that forced us to scrap a lot of last week's data :( Rest assured, everything has been fixed by now and we've learned a lot from that.</p><h2>Updates</h2><p>Today we're rolling out a large update. You should find yourself delighted from many things that will make Rankpanel easier and faster to use.</p><p>One thing we are putting a lot of thought into is to display information in the most accessible way. After <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/communicating-seo-data-effectively/">reworking the graphs</a> we have completely overhauled the tables. Our beautiful new tables have a higher contrast making them more readable. We're also using colors to emphasize on which row you focus and better graphics. The new tables should make the site much more coherent as well. What do you think?</p><p>Another thing that bugged us was the calendar. Selecting dates was not as easy as it should have been. We have fixed that now :)</p><p>To be finished with the content pages we've also redone the whole help section. <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/help">Have a look at our new help section</a>. All your questions should be answered by our Sun-Tsu-Help master. And in case any questions remain, please contact us via our new <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/contact">contact form</a>.</p><p>Of course we've also used the time to fix many things in the machine room.</p><p>One more thing :) If everything works out, you should be able to export data from Rankpanel next week. How about that?</p>]]></description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/meet-the-all-new-better-and-higher-quality-rankpanel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rankpanel in the SEOquake toolbar</title>
			<link>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/rankpanel-in-the-seoquake-toolbar/</link>
			<comments>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/rankpanel-in-the-seoquake-toolbar/#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Alexander Puschilov</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/?p=1071</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" height="170" src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/rank-quake.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="rankpanel-plus-seoquake" title="rankpanel-plus-seoquake" /></p><p>You know what would be great? If you'd have the SEOscore available to check any website you like <strong>while you're surfing</strong>! And although a native Rankpanel toolbar is a bit off, you can easily get all the Rankpanel gold in your browser using another great tool: SEOquake. Adding a button for SEOscore, number of keywords and number of rankings is easy and will take you less than a minute! Let me show you how.</p><span id="more-1071"></span><h2>SEOquake</h2><p>In case you're not familiar with SEOquake, it is the most popular SEO Browser toolbar. It is free and you can <a href="http://www.seoquake.com/">downloada</a> it directly on their site. It supports all major browsers (Firefox, Chrome, Opera and Safari) except Internet Explorer.</p><h2>Adding the Rankpanel buttons</h2><p>Although SEOquake comes already equipped with many useful parameters, Rankpanel is not included (yet). But fortunately they make it quite easy to add parameter-values. </p><p>Defining parameters in SEOquake can be done in "SEOquake Preferences &gt; New": Just enter four different values, <em>Name</em>, <em>Title</em>, <em>URL_R</em>, <em>REGEXP</em>.</p><p>Fortunately you don't even have to know what these values stand for, because I'll hook you up with all the honey you need below (but if you're reaaaaaally interested you can <a href="http://www.seoquake.com/pages/articles/writing_parameters.php">look them up</a>).</p><img src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/seoquake-parameter.png" alt="" title="seoquake-parameter" width="495" height="536" class="alignright size-full wp-image-1078" border=1/><h3>Adding the SEOscore</h3><p>[Name]=<code>Rankpanel SEOscore US</code>[Title]=<code>US SEOscore</code>[URL_R]=<code>http://www.rankpanel.com/seoscorehistory?d={clean_domain|encode}&amp;dc=us</code>[REGEXP]=<code>&lt;tbody&gt;.*?&lt;td class=&quot;.*?score_0&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;(.*?)&lt;/span&gt;</code></p><h3>Adding the number of rankings</h3><p>[Name]=<code>Rankpanel Rankings US</code>[Title]=<code>Rankings</code>[URL_R]=<code>http://www.rankpanel.com/organickeywords?d={clean_domain|encode}&amp;dc=us</code>[REGEXP]=<code>&lt;dd&gt;(.*?)&lt;a</code></p><h3>Adding the number of keywords</h3><p>[Name]=<code>Rankpanel Keywords US</code>[Title]=<code>US Keywords</code>[URL_R]=<code>http://www.rankpanel.com/organicpagedistribution?d={clean_domain|encode}&amp;dc=us</code>[REGEXP]=<code>.*keys_0&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;(.*?)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot; keys_percent_0 organicpagedistribution_keys_percent_0&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;-&lt;/span&gt;</code></p><h3>PPCscore</h3><p>[Name]=<code>PPCscore US</code>[Title]=<code>US PPCscore</code>[URL_R]=<code>http://www.rankpanel.com/ppcscorehistory?d={clean_domain|encode}&amp;dc=us</code>[REGEXP]=<code>&lt;tbody&gt;.*?&lt;td class=&quot;.*?score_0&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;(.*?)&lt;/span&gt;</code></p><h3>Number of paid rankings</h3><p>[Name]=<code>Rankpanel Paid Rankings US</code>[Title]=<code>US Paid Rankings</code>[URL_R]=<code>http://www.rankpanel.com/paidkeywords?d={clean_domain|encode}&amp;dc=us</code>[REGEXP]=<code>&lt;dd&gt;(.*?)&lt;/dd&gt;</code></p><h3>Adding the parameters for another country</h3><p>If you'd like to add the SEOscore or any other parameter for another country, just exchange the end of the [URL_R] string:</p><ul><li>US: &amp;dc=us</li><li>UK: &amp;dc=en</li><li>FR: &amp;dc=fr</li><li>DE: &amp;dc=de</li><li>ES: &amp;dc=es</li><li>IT: &amp;dc=it</li></ul><p>After you've done adding the Rankpanel buttons, you just have make sure to set a tick on the &quot;Toolbar&quot; column for all of them. Now you can use the buttons in the toolbar. And if you'd like to see the details of any site in Rankpanel simply click on the Rankpanel button after the value is loaded and it will take you directly to the correct Rankpanel screen. Pure magic! Keep in mind, though, that in order to enjoy this luxury you've got to be logged into Rankpanel. Enjoy :)</p>]]></description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/rankpanel-in-the-seoquake-toolbar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Identifying your real SEO competition</title>
			<link>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/identifying-your-real-seo-competition/</link>
			<comments>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/identifying-your-real-seo-competition/#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Alexander Puschilov</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Case Study]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/?p=996</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="160" height="240" src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/competition.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Competition" title="Competition" /></p><p>A big part of SEO is picking the right enemies to fight. But with millions of results per keyword finding comparable competitors is no easy task. There are tools that suggest competitors automatically, however we found that they mostly list amazon and wikipedia, simply because they rank for so many keywords. Our goal with Rankpanel is to make SEO understandable and effective for everybody. This is why in this post I will lay out a structured and effective process of finding the relevant competition.</p><span id="more-996"></span><h2>Find your focus</h2><p>Competition always has context and in SEO the rankings are the context <a href="http://clicktotweet.com/ea_aU" target="blank">(Tweet This)</a>. So the first thing is identifying the keyword focus. In order to determine the relevant competition a selection of 20 keywords is usually a good place to start. </p><h2>Example</h2><p>Let's look at an example: <a href="http://www.pegasuslighting.com/">Pegasuslighting.com</a> is a niche online shop with a very fine name that focuses on lighting.</p><h3>Automatic suggestions</h3><p>I have tested the suggestions of 2 well-known tools, in order to see what they come up with for the top 5 competitors:<img src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/unlimited-competition.png" align=right title="unlimited-competition" width="321" height="237" class="alignright size-full wp-image-1039" /><ul><li>Tool 1<ul><li>amazon.com</li><li>lightinguniverse.com</li><li>lampsplus.com</li><li>homedepot.com</li><li>lightingdirect.com</li></ul></li><li>Tool 2<ul><li>lightinguniverse.com</li><li>lampsplus.com</li><li>lightingdirect.com</li><li>ylighting.com</li><li>buylighting.com</li></ul></li></ul>First thing that pops into mind is that both tools suggest lightinguniverse, lightingdirect and lampsplus. Whereas the first tool lists broader ecommerce sites like amazon, the second tool seems to be more focused on the lighting niche.</p><p>But are these real competitors of the shop we're looking at? A quick <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/fc7db6671c9e328d2f4659e211376085/" title="Comparing the SEOscore of the top suggested competitors">SEOscore comparison</a> reveals that these three domains have a SEOscore at least 30 times higher! So going head to head with these players does not make much sense for our niche shop for now.</p><h2>Filtering potential SEO competitors</h2><p>This means we're back at square one... Let's ditch the easy solution and pause for a minute to think. How do our main competitors look like?<ul><li>They're in the same industry, which is why they focus on the same keywords</li><li>Their rank is comparable or better</li><li>Their size in terms of products, which translates into number of ranking keywords, or simply SEOscore, is comparable</li></ul></p><p>Knowing this, the process of determining the relevant competition is then straightforward:<ol><li>Check the Organic SERP for the focus keywords to identify potential competitors<ul><li>For each keyword look at all domains that rank on your page and higher than you do</li></ul></li><li>Filter the potential competitors by relevance:<ul><li>Count how often they rank for our focus keywords</li><li>Count how often they rank above us</li></ul></li><li>Make sure potential competitors are comparable:<ul><li>Comparable # of rankings</li><li>Comparable SEOscore</li></ul></li></ol></p><h2>Determining your real competitors</h2><p>Put all your data in an Excel spreadsheet and <a href='http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/Determining-relevant-SEO-competitors.xlsx'>determine your relevant SEO competitors</a> (for this example I've only used 10 keywords). Then calculate the competitor score by taking into account the difference between your domain and both, the potential competitors and their relevance. In a last step rank the competitors by decreasing score. <em>Et viola</em> you have a list of your top and relevant competitors:<ul><li>brodwax.com</li><li>budgetlighting.com</li><li>1stoplighting.com</li><li>jascoproducts.com</li><li>destinationlighting.com</li></ul></p><p>Now that you have found your major competitors it is also not that hard to figure out how to overtake them. You should start with <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/seo-research-using-rankpanel/">SEO research</a>. In this article I come up with <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/seo-research-using-rankpanel-ii/">actionable insights</a> on how you can overtake your competition. So it's definitely worth a read :)</p><p>What you think of the methodology I propose? Have you used something similar to come up with relevant competitors?</p><br /><br /><p>Feature image source: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/matt_hintsa/3208710538/">Flickr</a></p>]]></description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/identifying-your-real-seo-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Google earnings report &#8211; more money with less ads</title>
			<link>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/google-earnings-report-more-money-with-less-ads/</link>
			<comments>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/google-earnings-report-more-money-with-less-ads/#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 10:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Alexander Puschilov</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Search engines]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/?p=930</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/card-shuffling.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="card-shuffling" title="card-shuffling" /></p><p>Google just presented splendid results for Q2 2012. Only rarely does a company of that size and profitability show such growth rates. For us as online marketing professionals, obviously, Google is not just any company but to an extent a company that determines our jobs. Certain <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/goog/4477453.htm">speculation</a> erupted online about how the recent algorithmic updates helped increase revenue by promoting ads and rendering organic results less relevant. I would like to address these concerns in this post and provide supporting evidence.</p><span id="more-930"></span><h2>The quarterly numbers (Q2 2012)</h2><div>Google's quarterly numbers are really impressive:<ul><li> Over $12b revenues<ul><li>Of which Google's websites contributed $7.5b</li></ul></li><li>21% growth rate on Google properties revenues</li></ul></div><p>Google's annual and quarterly reports reveal not only numbers but also help analyze its  <a href="http://growmap.com/google-trends/">long-term strategy and trends</a>. This quarterly report ads small pieces to the puzzle: Advertising in search is just not sexy enough anymore because <a href="http://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2012/07/Slide2-600x450.jpg">revenue growth rates are declining</a> and <em>are expected to decline over time</em>. The next hot areas are <em>social, enterprise, <strong>commerce</strong>, and local</em> (see p.2 of <a href="http://investor.google.com/pdf/2012Q2_google_earnings_slides.pdf">earnings slides</a>)</p><h2>The ads on google.com</h2><p>Google states in the quarterly report, that the success of its advertising business depends among other things on:</p><blockquote><ul><li>The relevance, objectivity, and quality of our search results and the relevance and quality of ads displayed with each search results page. </li><li>The number and prominence of ads displayed on our websites But did advertising really increase overall? </li></ul></blockquote><div align="center"><img src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/google-number-adwords-change-rankpanel.png" alt="The number of AdWords Google shows changed significantly" title="google-number-adwords-change-rankpanel" width="428" height="134"/></div><br /><p>Rankpanel's <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/0985df8ea926e72866445f6514a0c5ae/ ">keyword coverage</a> is very well suited to answer this question in one click: When comparing the number of keywords with ads for 3rd week of July 2011 with the same week in 2012 it is quite clear that <strong>ads shown decreased significantly</strong>! (I also checked other weeks in the same quarter and found comparable results.)</p><br /><a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/0985df8ea926e72866445f6514a0c5ae/ "><img src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/AdWords-position-shift-rankpanel.png" alt="Google shifted the positions where AdWords are shown in the SERP" title="AdWords-position-shift-rankpanel" width="600" height="367" /></a><br /><p>What we see, though, is a significant change in ad distribution on the SERP. Google moved clearly away from showing only ads on the right side and towards showing ads above the organic results. The change is dramatic: In 2012 Google shows 13 times more SERPs with exclusively top ads, while SERPs with both only ads to the right and both right and top ads decreased. At the same time SERPs showing no ads at all doubled!</p><p>This shift can explain the 42% increase in paid clicks, as top ads have a significantly higher CTR.</p><p>It does also point towards the conclusion that not lower quality search results but different ad placement drove Google's revenue.</p><h2>Other factors driving revenue</h2><p>Having said that, the Rankpanel keyword set is composed of 500k keywords. Therefore, these results do not reflect on the long tail.</p><p>Another known factor is not represented in the numbers: Google has increased the number of ways to monetize the SERP via, e.g.<ul><li> Paid product listings</li><li> Vertical affiliates, such as flights</li><li> Monetization via Youtube videos</li></ul></p><p>All these things have pushed organic results down below the fold, as shown in the now famous <a href="http://www.seobook.com/images/ads-ads-ads.gif">&quot;hd monitor&quot; example</a> or <a href="http://www.seobook.com/images/google-serp-layout.gif">local things</a>. </p><h2>Conclusion</h2><ol><li>The numbers and trends suggest that Google is overall leaving less money in the SERP. <a href="http://clicktotweet.com/eaQYc">Tweet this</a> <br />Better monetization is achieved via<ul><li>AdWords position shifting </li><li>New ways of monetization</li></ul></li><li>I don't think that Google would cut in their own flesh by diminishing the quality of search results on purpose, given the increased amount of SERPs with no ads whatsoever. <a href="http://clicktotweet.com/cRc5x">Tweet this</a></li></ol><strong>We frequently tweet SEO insights. You should follow us on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/rankpanel">@rankpanel</a></strong><br /><br /><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ralphunden/1427116333/">Picture attribution</a>]]></description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/google-earnings-report-more-money-with-less-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Communicating SEO data effectively</title>
			<link>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/communicating-seo-data-effectively/</link>
			<comments>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/communicating-seo-data-effectively/#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Alexander Puschilov</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/?p=893</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="200" height="200" src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/Rankpanel-Chart-Updates.png" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Rankpanel-Chart-Updates" title="Rankpanel-Chart-Updates" /></p><p>We have launched <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/" title="Rankpanel">Rankpanel</a> publicly 3 months ago. It's been a great ride so far. First of all I would like to thank all our brave users for helping and supporting us. You guys are great! We feel very fortunate that our product was received so well all over the world. Reacting to your feedback from surveys and user testing we started to change things and improve our site. You've noticed our beautiful new <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/" title="Rankpanel">Homepage</a>, <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/about" title="Look at our About page">About</a> and <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/features" title="Look at our Feature page">Feature</a> pages. Now it's time for the app.</p><span id="more-893"></span><h2>Data visualization</h2><p>Visualizing data is central to interpreting and communicating it effectively. Charts can help detect trends and understand how things fit together. They make it easier to recognize proportions and put things into perspective. </p><p>In Rankpanel it is easy to get lost in all those numbers and metrics we provide, especially for SEO beginners. This is why charts improve the user experience a lot and are a central element to all analytics applications, not just Rankpanel. Since our launch one of the things that bugged us (and you) the most were our charts. However, whenever we looked at other tools, we found that they did not communicate data better than us. I mean even <a href="http://blog.codahale.com/2006/04/29/google-analytics-the-goggles-they-do-nothing/" title="Google Analytics: The goggles they do nothing/">Google Analytics started out with bad charts</a>. This is why we set out on a trip to get the <em>best data visualization into SEO</em> (and had our fair share of fun and chart porn while inspecting many <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail" title="The Economist has great charts">best practices</a>).</p><h2>New Charts</h2><p>Today we have launched our new charts. Our goal was to convey data in the best possible way. This is why our charts need to be <a href="http://blog.vovici.com/blog/bid/56390/Boring-Bar-Charts-Made-More-Boring" title="Boring charts FTW">boring</a>. However, boring does not mean that the charts will not be visually pleasing. (I hope you agree with us that the charts are much prettier now.) I think with the charts we've just released we have achieved the maximum of both, as our charts: 1. Effectively communicate information 2. Do not entertain or confuse 3. Display only necessary details 4. Are so pretty, you wanna lick them ;)</p><h2>Improvements</h2><img src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/Page-distribution.jpg" alt="Page distribution comparison of nytimes.com over 2 weeks" title="Page-distribution" width="600" height="380" class="alignright size-full wp-image-918" /><p>If you look at our new <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/511d204a911fb756e0ff675941e7bda0/" title="All new SEOscore chart comparing 3 domains">SEOscore charts</a> you will find it much more readable and bigger. Now that they're beautiful we're really proud to present them :)</p><p>We have also included an interactive legend that lets you conveniently focus on domains while making clear which line belongs to which domain. You can also quickly turn on/off other domains in the charts when performing comparisons.</p><p>Because the SEOscore is a an index, the colored area of a mountain chart helps to see its height. Detecting the difference between two SEOscore lines is also improved. </p><p>We have also reduced a lot of clutter and things that did not directly contribute to communicating information. For instance in the <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/c3a67b86af30fa9c0c3bb69249977aed/" title="All new page distribution chart of nytimes.com">page distribution</a> when comparing between different points in time only the shades change.</p><img src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/SEOscore-chart.jpg" alt="SEOscore comparison of nytimes, washingtonpost, and reuters" title="SEOscore-chart" width="600" height="380" class="alignright size-full wp-image-915" /><p>So we've put in a lot of work into our charts and will continue to improve them and add more interesting visualizations soon. What do you think about our new charts? Do you like them? Have we missed any data visualization best practices?</p>]]></description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/communicating-seo-data-effectively/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Obama vs Romney the SEO battle</title>
			<link>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/obama-vs-romney-the-seo-battle/</link>
			<comments>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/obama-vs-romney-the-seo-battle/#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Alexander Puschilov</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Case Study]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/?p=684</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="373" height="334" src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/Obama-ACII-Logo.png" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Obama-ACII-Logo" title="Obama-ACII-Logo" /></p>In 4 months the US citizens will vote for a new president. The outcome of the upcoming election will be greatly influenced by how well both candidates perform online. Arguably, the web channel is more important in the US than in most other countries for several reasons. First of all, the US population is <a href="http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.P2?order=wbapi_data_value_2010+wbapi_data_value+wbapi_data_value-last&sort=desc">more internet-oriented</a> compared to most other countries rendering online an important information channel. Moreover, due to the <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/02/historic-price-cost-presidential-elections">significant costs</a> associated with running for president the internet has become an important fundraising channel. In 2008 Obama famously used a grassroots approach to finance his candidacy making use of microgiving, conversion optimization, donation subscription, and many other innovations. This alone yielded <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/06/the-amazing-money-machine/6809/">45m in online donations </a>in only one month by far surpassing income from fund-raising. For a candidate, raising funds online in a cost-effective and scalable matter can be decisive in order to cross finance the mass media advertising in TV and print needed to fight all the <a href="http://www.quora.com/U-S-Presidential-Elections/In-the-age-of-the-Internet-and-lean-why-does-it-take-1-billion-to-re-elect-a-president">misinformation</a>. This is why in this article we will look at how this years candidates do in SEO.<span id="more-684"></span><h2>The candidates on the web</h2>Both candidates know how important the internet can be for their success and accordingly take it seriously. This is why dedicated online professionals, or in Obama's case "<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/feb/17/obama-campaign-digital-team">digital wizards</a>" are on board of both candidate's core teams. From an SEO perspective presidential candidates must attract many visitors to their sites for two reasons: information and donation. When it comes to information a candidate's site aims to rank for important terms that drive her campaign, such as "the economy" or "gun rights". Bringing her points across and convincing visitors to vote for the candidate can be decisive in the dawn of the election. In order to analyze how the websites score we use the <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/help/walkthrough/basics#seoscore">Rankpanel SEOscore</a> and <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/help/walkthrough/basics#ppcscore">PPCscore</a> and information on <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/help/walkthrough/basics#organickeywords">organic keywords</a>.<h3>The contender: <a href="http://www.mittromney.com/">mittromney.com</a></h3><a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/0a1ba27d861e0dd9fea0dbcd52585b8a/"><img src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/Mitt-Romney-SEO-Score.png" alt="" title="Mittromney.com rapidly increased its SEOscore" width="600" height="239" class="wp-image-804" align="center" /></a> Mittromney.com can be called a SEO success story after looking at its <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/0a1ba27d861e0dd9fea0dbcd52585b8a/">SEO development</a>. Since November 2011 it grew significantly in the organic index doubling its SEOscore within the last 15 weeks. Whereas it had only 128 rankings at the end of March it has 210 by now. On a closer look we find 147 unique keywords that the site ranks for. Of those, most are branded terms that contain either "mitt" or "romney". However in <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/cec37d3bf03c6fbda3bbd00a7071f2ee/">Romney's rankings</a> there are also a few of these opinion-driving general terms, such as "<a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/63a4ba4e217a6e84dce8f31ad0cb5c61/">gun rights</a>", "<a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/06353d490b87deb8724a7e59bbb1984f/">human capital</a>", and "<a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/adab4a52ec4efc4c906de28ac71eeb88/">regulation</a>" ranking in the top 20 and others ranking lower. Romney also engages in PPC bidding for his own name and that of his republican challengers "john mccain" and "newt gingrich 2012".<h3>The cup holder: <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/">barackobama.com</a></h3><a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/ee3d9661b3f3da8cbe984f21b8e65aa9/"><img src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/Barack-Obama-SEO-score.png" alt="" title="Barackobama.com stayed on a constantly high level SEOscore-wise" width="600" height="239" class="wp-image-805" align="center" /></a>President <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/ee3d9661b3f3da8cbe984f21b8e65aa9/">Obama's organic visibility</a> stayed on a constant and relatively high level over the previous year. His site has <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/5cbc61accef76d176126b9acbbbf66d2/">679 rankings</a> for 468 unique search terms. Like Romney Obama ranks for his name in combination with different other words, but has also many more positions for high-traffic informational terms such as "<a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/44e263b3864edef1f965c0b47d4af316/">healthcare</a>", "<a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/08f95db2589cad3730941eb4625d8265/">tax cut</a>", or "<a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/62501af1c633f035c18b6f31bb4c3b21/">the economy</a>" and many more. His AdWords strategy also goes above and beyond that of Romney. Obama bids on such interesting terms as "democratic party" and "el presidente".<h2>How do they compare?</h2><a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/ebd313bb53c6e3c8be2bd88d5d67af0c/"><img src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/SEOscore-comparison-Obama-Romney.png" alt="" title="SEOscore-comparison-Obama-Romney" width="600" height="239" class="alignright size-full wp-image-833" align="center"/></a>What I found interesting when looking at the sites is that they share common design: The blue header with the red call-to-action button and Facebook and Twitter icons look very similar. But it is in the details, where Obama and his team show more expertise and attention for detail:<ol><li>barackobama.com has <i>geekappeal</i></li><ul><li>site uses new web technologies</li><li>site has clean frontend code, with Obama's campaign logo in ASCII (extra points)</li><li>site is custom built, not as in the case of Romney built on Drupal</li></ul><li>barackobama.com shows conversion optimization know-how</li><ul><li>e.g. additionally to the "Donate" call-to-action it also includes a more specific and potentially higher converting "Quick Donate $5" button, which is in sync with Obama's focus on small grassroots donations</li></ul></ol>But I digress... When it comes to organic rankings barackobama.com is quite strong. But not only because of the rankings found, it also has more than 40 times as many indexed pages in Google as mittromney.com (664k vs 16k). Given that discrepancy one could think that Obama's page is also much more visible. Using the search volumes, which Rankpanel conveniently shows next to the keywords, for those keywords where the sites rank in the top 10 Google results Obama's page reaches 57% (990k vs 630k) more searchers with 3 times as many rankings (49 vs 17). Having said that, Obama's site will most likely come up much more often in the long tail.<h2>Conclusion</h2><ol><li>A successful presidential candidacy has a lot in common with successful startups: Both require a great and balanced team as well as innovation. <a href="http://clicktotweet.com/9a80W">Tweet this</a></li><li>The president can use his years of head start and play them wisely in SEO to gain a competitive advantage. <a href="http://clicktotweet.com/0y0u4">Tweet this</a></li><li>When it comes to the online channel Romney may be served best by copying Obama. <a href="http://clicktotweet.com/d6Jcr">Tweet this</a></li></ol>]]></description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/obama-vs-romney-the-seo-battle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tracking the Trackers</title>
			<link>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/tracking-the-trackers/</link>
			<comments>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/tracking-the-trackers/#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Alexander Puschilov</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Search engines]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/?p=686</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/tracking-domains.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="tracking-domains" title="tracking-domains" /></p>Because SEOs and search engine marketers work more and more together, Rankpanel includes tools for both parties. While the majority of our users register mainly for Rankpanel's organic search capabilities, Rankpanel does also offer interesting SEM market research tools. One thing I find interesting is the tracking domain information. Tracking domains are those domains that visitors are directed through when clicking on a Google AdWords advertisement. As the name suggests tracking software providers, such as Doubleclick offer many tracking capabilities that go beyond what the free tools of Google & co have.<span id="more-686"></span><h2>First of all what are tracking tools?</h2>Tracking of online ads is a big business. Companies such as <a href="http://www.google.com/doubleclick/">DoubleClick</a> and <a href="http://atlassolutions.com/home">Atlas Solutions</a> were bought for billions of dollars. By now these companies offer many more things than just tracking, but I would like to focus only on tracking here. Many companies and agencies that run campaigns on Google use ad tracking for various reasons, and if your brand plays this game you should be aware of what technology your competitors are using.<h3>What do the tracking tools offer</h3>Tracking tools offer mainly advantages for companies running big campaigns over multiple channels. There are two distinct categories of advantages of tracking tools over the free tools such as Microsoft adCenter, performance improvements and campaign management improvements:<ol><li>Performance improvements</li><ul><li>Lets you use define rule based strategies, e.g. ROI-based that automate bidding for one keyword or hundreds</li><li>Real time bidding on keywords</li><li>Balance the overall performance of all the keywords in each group to which a bidding strategy is applied</li><li>Allow advertisers to track conversions over different channels, such as when running a campaign that consists of both display and search</li></ul><li>Campaign management improvements</li><ul><li>Allows for campaign management over multiple channels and ad-serving platforms through one interface, making it easier and saving time</li></ul></ol><h2>What does Rankpanel tell me about tracking tools?</h2>The Rankpanel <a href="http://rankpanel.com/features">paid search tools</a> track AdWords in our panel of 500,000 keywords every week. One thing that we keep an eye on are the tracking providers used, as represented by their tracking domains. Tracking domains are domains where the user gets redirected through when clicking on an ad before landing on the client's destination page. There are several reasons why I find tracking domains data so interesting. First of all, who knew that of the top 10 display domains only 3 are also top 10 tracking domains (<a href="http://clicktotweet.com/NnYfw">tweet this</a>). This alone says how important tracking has become.<a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/4a055faf03716b33ba26ca95933a8961/"><img src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/Top-AdWords-display-domains.png" alt="" title="Top-AdWords-display-domains" width="444" height="317" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-731" /></a><a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/313abe9e7e23e4dc2ea5bf5648f336fc/"><img src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/Top-AdWords-tracking-domains.png" alt="" title="Top-AdWords-tracking-domains" width="444" height="317" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-732" /></a>Tracking providers also manage more AdWords visibility than the biggest 10 domains themselves. Kenshoo, which is the largest tracking provider in the US as represented by their xg4ken.com tracking domain, has a PPCscore nearly 25% higher than the largest display domain, ask.com. It is also quite large international, tracking in total nearly 270k keywords in the six Rankpanel countries (<a href="http://clicktotweet.com/xdFZX">tweet this</a>). The country to country variations are large, though:<img src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/Kenshoo-keywords-per-country-Rankpanel.png" alt="" title="Kenshoo-keywords-per-country-Rankpanel" width="600" height="337" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-753" />But who are the companies that use tracking services of these providers? To find that out, you just have to look at the <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/99d83701597735ac7d589b840b11a088/">paid keywords of the tracking domain</a>: With Kenshoo alone you will find nearly all big brands from A like ABC to Z like Zazzle.com. So go ahead now and let your SEM colleagues know that they too should you Rankpanel by <a href="http://clicktotweet.com/5c0IC">clicking to tweet</a>.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/amarcord69/6359480683">Photo attribution</a>]]></description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/tracking-the-trackers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Data Monday &#8211; Top SEO discoveries (06/18/2012)</title>
			<link>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/data-monday-top-seo-discoveries-06182012/</link>
			<comments>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/data-monday-top-seo-discoveries-06182012/#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Alexander Puschilov</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Search engines]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/?p=677</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[For all Rankpanel users each Monday is just a little bit more special. The reason is that we publish our weekly updates always on Mondays. As SEO is an always changing field be assured that every week starts with surprises. In the &#8220;Data Monday&#8221; series I will look at a ...]]></description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/data-monday-top-seo-discoveries-06182012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Domain migration and SEO: An evidence-based analysis</title>
			<link>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/domain-migration-and-seo/</link>
			<comments>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/domain-migration-and-seo/#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Alexander Puschilov</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Search engines]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/?p=618</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/Domain_migration.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Domain_migration" title="Domain_migration" /></p>Changing domain names is risky from a SEO perspective - but how risky is it really? Usually, when management decides to change domain names, we as SEOs can’t really do much but go with it. In many cases domain changes are driven by brand strategy and are C-level decisions. Other often encountered reasons for domain change are migration to a country-specific TLD or to an authoritative TLD, e.g. from .cc to .com. Therefore, as SEOs our role is to mitigate the risks and protect our precious rankings as good as we can.<span id="more-618"></span><h2>Quick domain change guide</h2>Most of us are familiar with best-practices concerning domain changes. Some even promise that they can move domains without losing rankings. Let's quickly summarize what we know:<h3>Before the migration:</h3>As soon as the new name is decided upon, you should do a background check of possible domain candidates looking at parameters like domain age, backlinks as well as running quick queries in <a href=" http://archive.org/web/web.php">archive.org</a> and whois. Buy the domain name that poses the least risk (read: new without any past or has a good past, e.g. some high page rank backlinks). Put something related to the company on the site as soon as possible, e.g. a crude version of the upcoming home page with only text and pictures or even just a few paragraphs describing the company. If you wait then you run the risk of being classified as a parked domain for longer than necessary.<h3>After the migration:</h3><ol><li>Permanently redirect (301) all pages from the old domain to the new one<ul><li>Lost link juice: 301s do not pass all the link juice</li></ul></li><li>301s are on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyQs3tz7ZKo">a page level</a><ul><li>crawling all pages takes time during which link juice is temporarily lost</li></ul></li><li>Fetch the new domain as Googlebot to discover inconsistencies</li><li>Submit the sitemap to Google<ul><li>Look for crawl errors on sites specified in the sitemap</li><li>Create a different Sitemap for each logical section of your site in order to discover badly indexed sections</li></ul></li><li>Verify both domains with Google Webmaster Tools and fill out a "change of address" request</li><li>Update the most important backlinks and links to the most important pages (as measured by conversions, traffic, rankings)<ul><li>You should regain at least some of the lost link juice</li></ul></li><li>Monitor traffic and rankings<ul><li>Look how rankings change and how it affects traffic</li></ul></li><li>Monitor linkbuilding<ul><li>Look for sudden changes in the growth rate of natural linkbuilding</li></ul></li><li>Do not immediately close/sell/reuse the old domain for something else<ul><li>Wait a couple of weeks and make sure that the old domain is out of the SERP and does not attract links anymore</li></ul></li></ol>All these things are well-known by professional SEOs and, although, complex can be expected to be implemented. Of course, there is also a comprehensive <a href="http://www.aleydasolis.com/images/seo-website-domain-migration.gif">infographic</a> about this by Aley Dasolis, just in case. However, other factors occur that fall outside of the SEO scope that can heavily undermine the best practices...<h2>Risks of domain migration</h2>Many domain migration problems arise due to the root cause of the migration: Branding. In many cases a domain change is also "celebrated" with a relaunch. It is not unusual that brands revamp their sites completely including a change of the CMS used and putting up new content. One example is Alertpay, which communicates the change to Payza quite tellingly: "new design, new features, new name" (<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20110721074152/https://www.alertpay.com/en/Default.aspx">before</a> and <a href="https://www.payza.com/">after</a>). As <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/switching-things-around/">Matt Cutts</a> says: <blockquote>"It’s better to change only one thing at a time so that if something goes horribly wrong, you can trace what caused it."</blockquote> In their case it will be quite hard to find the cause should a problem occur. This also means, though, you should take the data below with a grain of salt as there are potentially many causes for what I am about to show you.<h2>But how risky is it really?</h2>The graph below shows the Rankpanel SEOscore for 8 domains in the 3 weeks leading to the domain change at week 0 and for the 8 new domains in the first 6 weeks after the domain change. You will also notice that I have normalized the data to week 0. The Rankpanel <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/help/walkthrough/basics#seoscore">SEOscore</a> is a search engine visibility metric that we calculate using the rankings in our panel of 500,000 keywords per country.<a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/Domain_migration_SEOscore.png"><img src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/Domain_migration_SEOscore.png" alt="Changing domains has an effect on the SEO " title="Domain migration SEOscore change" width="600" height="228" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-632" /></a>We see the following things:<ul><li>In 6/8 cases the SEOscore decreased after the domain migration</li><li>In 2 cases it improved</li><li>In 6/8 cases the SEOscore decreased leading up to the migration</li></ul>So, yes a domain migration can be completed without losing rankings, although, in most cases rankings do decrease. Domain migration seems also to have a negative effect on rankings leading up to the relaunch. I guess this is because it is such an important project that it bounds too many resources and it makes no sense to invest in the old domain anymore. While looking through the results we see how long it can take until a good old site stops ranking. In the case of auctionarms shown below, it took 8 weeks until it disappeared from Rankpanel, meaning that it was not in the top 100 for the 500,000 keywords we monitor. (<b>Click on the picture below to get all the data.</b>)<a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/b3ca1f08fd9187136ede03c47fecbd4a/"><img src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/SEOscore_gunauction_auctionarms.png" alt="The change in SEOscore for migration from gunauction to auctionarms" title="SEOscore_gunauction_auctionarms" width="600" height="364" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-643" /></a>In other cases, the old domains do not disappear from the SERPs at all. When looking at the csnstores pages <a href="http://www.rankpanel.com/external/18f7c175510df0193aa02dad90240f50/">that still rank</a> more than 8 months after the migration to wayfair.com we see that .pdfs from the subdirectory "common" were left on the old domain and are therefore still in the index. This is why monitoring the migration is so important. It can quickly reveal things that got lost along the way.<h2>Takeaways</h2><ol><li>Domain migration is a complex issue, so take your time and plan it thoroughly.</li><li>Most domains lose rankings before and after the migration, so don’t migrate during your most important business times (e.g. before Christmas for E-Commerce sites). On the other hand, you can use these week times of your competitors to your advantage.</li><li>Monitor your old and new sites long enough after the migration to detect mistakes.</li></ol><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jeffk/18581438/in/photostream/">Picture attribution</a>]]></description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/domain-migration-and-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Google search parameters in 2012</title>
			<link>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/google-search-parameters/</link>
			<comments>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/google-search-parameters/#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 10:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Rankpanel</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Search engines]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/?p=409</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/search_parameters.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Where does the way go with Google&#039;s search parameters?" title="search_parameters" /></p>Knowing the parameters Google uses in its search is not only important for SEO geeks. It allow you to use shortcuts and play with the Google filters. The parameters also reveal more juicy things: Is it safe to share your Google search URLs or screenshots of your Google results? <a href="http://blog.yjl.im/2012/03/not-so-good-urls.html">This post</a> argues that it is important to be aware of the complicated nature of the Google URL. As we will see later posting your own Google URL can reveal personal information about you that you might not feel too comfortable sharing. So read on to learn more about the Google search parameters used in 2012.<span id="more-409"></span>Why do I say "in 2012"? Well, the Google URL changed over time and more parameters were added to keep pace with the increasing complexity of the search product, the Google interface and the integration of verticals. Before looking at the parameter table below, though, I encourage you to quickly perform the following 2 things:<ol><li>Go directly to <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> and search for your name. Look at the URL.</li><li>Go directly to <a href="http://duckduckgo.com">DuckDuckGo</a> and perform the same search. Look at the URL.</li></ol>This little exercise serves well to demonstrate just how simple and how complicated URLs used by search engines can look like. These two cases are at the opposing ends: While DuckDuckGo has only one search parameter, your query, and is therefore quite readable, Google uses a cryptic construct that only IT professionals can try to decipher. What I find interesting is that on my Smartphone, though, the Google search URL is much simpler than on the desktop. This blog post is primarily aimed at Google's web search. I will not look at their other verticals such as scholar or images. But because image search is so useful, I encourage you to look at the image section of the <a href="http://jwebnet.net/advancedgooglesearch.html#imgRestrict">Unofficial Google Advanced Search guide</a>. Google also shares some of their well-known parameters in their <a href="https://developers.google.com/search-appliance/documentation/50/xml_reference">search protocol reference</a>, so you might want to refer to it for languages, countries and other standard things. Now, without any more interruptions look at the search parameters Google reveals to us.<h2>Normal Search - all you really need</h2>DuckDuckGo shows us all we really need when searching, a "search?" initializer followed by the query. Not more and not less. When sharing Google searches online you might want to limit the URL to only this single one parameter.<table border="1" width="100%"><tbody><tr><th>Parameter (with example)</th><th>Description</th></tr><tr><td>q=your+query</td><td>Primary Google search parameter containing your query. Usually appears directly after the <em>search?</em> initiator. When you search directly via the Google website you don't see the <em>search?</em> initiator anymore. But searches from e.g. Browser toolbars still have it.</td></tr></tbody></table><h2>Advanced search operators</h2>Google is quite versatile. It offers many ways to filter results. Therefore, knowing the advanced search operators can significantly enhance your productivity when working with Google. You will find some parameters more interesting than others. Try combining the different values to get the results you are really looking for.<table border="1" width="100%"><tbody><tr><th>Parameter (with example)</th><th>Description</th></tr><tr><td>as_q=should+contain</td><td>The results should contain all of the words entered, same as normal search</td></tr><tr><td>as_epq=must+include</td><td>It's the exact phrase that you're looking for. It can also be entered in brackets like <strong>"must include"</strong></td></tr><tr><td>as_oq=any+of+these</td><td>The results should contain any of these words, the search operator is <strong>OR</strong></td></tr><tr><td>as_eq=none+of+these</td><td>The results should contain none of these words, the search operator is <strong>-</strong></td></tr><tr><td>as_dt=e</td><td>What as_eq is for queries as_dt is for operators, as_dt=e excludes the following operator, as_dt=i includes it, e.g. as_dt=e&amp;as_filetype=pdf returns results excluding pdfs, can also be entered using the <strong>-</strong> in front of the operator</td></tr><tr><td>as_filetype=pdf</td><td>Returns results of a certain filetype, e.g. pdf, can be entered into query <strong>filetype:</strong></td></tr><tr><td>as_lq</td><td>Returns a sample of links to any site, also usable via the <strong>link:</strong> command</td></tr><tr><td>as_sitesearch</td><td>Search a specified site, you can also use the operator <strong>site:</strong></td></tr><tr><td>as_rq</td><td>Shows a sample of related websites, also addressable using <strong>related:</strong></td></tr><tr><td>as_occt=any</td><td>Specify where keywords shall occur on the page&nbsp;<ul><li>any</li><li>title</li><li>body</li><li>url</li><li>links</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td>as_nlo=1</td><td>Numbers range starts with 1</td></tr><tr><td>as_nhi=44</td><td>Numbers range ends with 44 a range. It can be typed into the search bar using 2 full stops <strong>..</strong> between the first and last number</td></tr><tr><td>as_rights=cc_attribute</td><td>This attribute limits the search results to pages that have certain rights. It is quite useful for things like image or graphics search. The possible attributes are:&nbsp;<ul><li>cc_publicdomain</li><li>cc_attribute</li><li>cc_sharealike</li><li>cc_noncommercial</li><li>cc_nonderived</li></ul>You can combine all of these attributes in one query putting them in brackets and combining them via the <strong>|</strong> character.</td></tr><tr><td>num=100</td><td>Sets the number of results per page. It can only be used if Google Instant results are turned off (see below complete=0). Instant limits results to 10 per page.</td></tr></tbody></table><h2>Country and language</h2>Google uses certain <a href="https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/appendix/countrycodes">country codes</a> and <a href="https://developers.google.com/search-appliance/documentation/64/xml_reference#request_subcollections">language names</a> in its search. For more localized results you can even enter certain <a href="https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/appendix/cities_world">cities</a> or <a href="https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/appendix/provincecodes">provinces</a>.<table border="1," width="100%"><tbody><tr><th>Parameter (with example)</th><th>Description</th></tr><tr><td>hl=en</td><td>Language settings passed down by your browser, here English</td></tr><tr><td>lr=lang_cs</td><td>The language the results should be in, here in Czech</td></tr><tr><td>cr=countryZA</td><td>The region the results should come from, here South Africa</td></tr><tr><td>gl=ca</td><td>Can be used to find results as if the search was conducted in a specified location, here Canada. However, given the fact that Google uses many cues for determining your actual location the results can be unreliable. Try turning off localization as much as possible to increase accuracy. The following <a href="http://www.johnmcelborough.com/remove-google-localisation">article</a> shows a way to remove localization from the Google results and this <a href="http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2011/08/google-search-by-country.html">blog post</a> offers a concise guide.</td></tr><tr><td>gr=US-NY</td><td>Just as gl shows you how results look in a specified country, gr limits the results to a certain region, here New York</td></tr><tr><td>gcs=Pittsburg</td><td>Limits results to a certain city, you can also use latitude and longitude</td></tr><tr><td>gpc=1020547</td><td>Limits results to a certain zip code, here agin Pittsburg</td></tr><tr><td>gm=619</td><td>Limits results to a certain metropolitan region, here Springfield MO</td></tr><tr><td>ie=utf-8</td><td>input encoding</td></tr><tr><td>oe=utf-8</td><td>output encoding</td></tr></tbody></table><h2>Google's advanced search tools</h2><table border="1," width="100%"><tbody><tr><th>Parameter (with example)</th><th>Description</th></tr><tr><td>tbs=rl%3A1%2Crls%3A0</td><td>Reading level: only basic results</td></tr><tr><td>tbs=rl%3A1%2Crls%3A1</td><td>Reading level: only intermediate results</td></tr><tr><td>tbs=rl%3A1%2Crls%3A2</td><td>Reading level: only advanced results</td></tr><tr><td>tbs=rl%3A1</td><td>Reading level: annotate reading level</td></tr><tr><td>tbs=dfn:1</td><td>Dictionary: definition of a word</td></tr><tr><td>tbs=img:1</td><td>Sites with images</td></tr><tr><td>tbs=sts:1</td><td>More text</td></tr><tr><td>tbs=clir:1</td><td>Translated foreign pages</td></tr><tr><td>tbs=li:1</td><td><a href="http://support.google.com/websearch/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=1734130">Verbatim</a> results</td></tr><tr><td>tbs=vid:1</td><td>Video results</td></tr><tr><td>tbs=nws:1</td><td>Google news results</td></tr><tr><td>tbs=rltm:1</td><td>Google realtime results</td></tr><tr><td>tbs=qdr</td><td>You can specify different time periods&nbsp;<ul><li>tbs=qdr:s - previous second</li><li>tbs=qdr:n - previous minute</li><li>tbs=qdr:h - previous hour</li><li>tbs=qdr:d - previous day</li><li>tbs=qdr:w - previous week</li><li>tbs=qdr:m - previous month</li><li>tbs=qdr:y - previous year</li><li>specify filter results by time frame, by appending it with ,sbd:1, such as tbs=qdr:m,sbd:1 you get search results sorted by date</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td>oi=video_result</td><td>The "oi" parameter is used for universal search results. You can use it in Google analytics filter to understand when people come to your site via the universal search results. Different universal search categories have their own parameters, here video results. Other notable categories are:&nbsp;<ul><li>Revisions_inline - related searches</li><li>image_result - image results</li><li>spell - spelling suggestion</li><li>Blogsearch_group - blog search results</li></ul></td></tr></tbody></table><h2>Other factors</h2>This section contains some of the most important Google parameters. You will learn how to turn off personalization and about the diverse filters that are applied by default.<table border="1," width="100%"><tbody><tr><th>Parameter (with example)</th><th>Description</th></tr><tr><td>pws=0</td><td>Parameter that allows you to <a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-personalized-pws-13224.html">turn-off personalization</a></td></tr><tr><td>cd=2</td><td>Passes down the keyword rank clicked. In analytics suites this can come in handy if you'd like to track the keyword rank. A guide how this can be applied can be found <a href="http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/track-keyword-rank-in-google-analytics">here</a></td></tr><tr><td>pq=previous+query</td><td>Shows the previous query. This parameter appears when switching queries during one Google session. It might be quite valuable to extract this parameter for analytics purposes to detect search chains. (thanks for the suggestion Reinier)</td></tr><tr><td>oq=original+query</td><td>Shows the original query. Try searching for one thing, say <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=sunflowers">sunflowers</a> and then searching on for sunflower seeds. You'll notice in the URL that a parameter oq=sunflower+X appears. X might be "seeds" or just nil depending on whether or not you have clicked on the Google suggest query. The query parameter will show the full query "&amp;q=sunflower+seeds", though. (thanks for the suggestion Reinier)&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>filter=0</td><td>Include omitted results</td></tr><tr><td>complete=0</td><td>Turn auto-suggest and Google Instant on (=1) or off (=0)</td></tr><tr><td>nfpr=1</td><td>Turn off auto-correction of spelling</td></tr><tr><td>ncr=1</td><td>No country redirect: Allows you to set the Google country engine you would like to use despite your current geographic location. Though it works best if no Google cookie has been set yet.</td></tr><tr><td>safe=on</td><td>Turns the adult content filter on or off</td></tr><tr><td>biw=1920</td><td>Browser inner width, here 1920px</td></tr><tr><td>bih=832</td><td>Browser inner height, here 832px</td></tr><tr><td>start=30</td><td>Show results rankings from this number, so 30 is page four for 10 results per page</td></tr><tr><td>sa=</td><td>User search behavior parameter&nbsp;<ul><li>sa=N - User searched</li><li>sa=X - User clicked on related searches in the SERP</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td>ei=</td><td>Passes on an alphanumeric parameter that decodes the originating SERP where user clicked on a related search. For instance when looking for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=coconut+water&amp;ncr=0&amp;filter=0">coconut water and clicking on "Whole Foods" you will notice the ei=... parameter. This parameter will be equal for all related search links. However, if you click on "Amazon" and then on "Whole Foods" (all through the related results links) you will notice a different "ei" parameter value for the same SERP, because the originating SERP "Amazon coconut water" was different from just "coconut water".</a></td></tr><tr><td>btnG=”Search”</td><td>Text that appears on the search button (customization option for including search on one’s own site), here "Search"</td></tr><tr><td>newwindow=1</td><td>Open the results in a new window</td></tr><tr><td>navclient/client/sourceid=ie7</td><td>Where the search originated from, e.g.:&nbsp;<ul><li>navclient - Google toolbar</li><li>navclient-ff - Google search toolbar for Firefox</li><li>firefox-a - Firefox search box</li><li>chrome</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td>rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official</td><td>Source of query with version of the client and language set, other examples are can be found <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum80/789.htm">here</a></td></tr><tr><td>source=univ</td><td>Google navigational parameter specifying where you came from, here universal search</td></tr><tr><td>tbo=1</td><td>Always show search tools in the left sidebar</td></tr><tr><td>prmd=</td><td>Parameter that determines which of Google's vertical search engines are suggested in the left sidebar besides web, they can be combined, the most important ones are:&nbsp;<ul><li>prmd=a - only applications</li><li>prmd=b - only books</li><li>prmd=c - only places</li><li>prmd=d - only discussions</li><li>prmd=i - only images</li><li>prmd=n - only news</li><li>prmd=s - only shopping</li><li>prmd=p - only patents</li><li>prmd=u - none (only web)</li><li>prmd=v - only video</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td>stick=</td><td>The stick parameter is one of the newest additions that we will likely see more and more. It encodes the knowledge graph box that is shown on the right next to many different queries. Try <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=Maranello&amp;stick=H4sIAAAAAAAAAONgVuLQz9U3ME82yAIAC_7r3AwAAAA">playing around with it</a>. Have a look at <a href="http://www.mkbergman.com/1009/deconstructing-the-google-knowledge-graph/">this post</a> that goes into more detail. (Thanks a lot for the suggestion Lev)</td></tr></tbody></table><h2>Unclear Parameters</h2>Google keeps adding new parameters to its URL. While most parameters are known, some aren't. During my research I could not come up with the function of the following parameters. If you're aware of what they do please post it into the comments section.<table border="1," width="100%"><tbody><tr><th>Parameter</th><th>Description</th></tr><tr><td>ved=</td><td>Passes on an alphanumeric parameter. Not clear what it is used for.</td></tr><tr><td>fp=</td><td>Passes on an alphanumeric parameter. Not clear what it is used for. However, results change when parameter is removed.</td></tr><tr><td>usd=</td><td>Passes on an alphanumeric parameter. Not clear what it is used for. Often contains part of the query string.</td></tr><tr><td>channel=fflb</td><td>?</td></tr><tr><td>qscrl=1</td><td>?</td></tr><tr><td>hs=jXu</td><td>?</td></tr></tbody></table><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/78586860@N00/3812167433">Photo attribution</a>]]></description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/google-search-parameters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>